Santa goes GREEN, by turning blue
Each year, Hollywood lowers itself and treats us “Christmas type” people with a holiday movie.
As with every Hollywood movie, there MUST be an important moral message tucked inside the story line that will slap us humans in the face, and remind us that we have been fat- slobs.
Some years, we “Christmas type” people are treated to a movie that shows if a person wants to skip Christmas, the “zombie like” religious neighbors will haunt these “Christmas skippers” until they cave in and celebrate Christmas the right way. (Christmas with the Kranks- Jamie Lee Curtis and Tim Allen)
Or sometimes Hollywood teaches us that people can get so hung up on Christmas gifts and holiday lights that they make their life a living hell. (Deck the Halls, Christmas Vacation, Jingle all the Way)
But in the end, Hollywood always teaches us the TRUE meaning of Christmas:
“The birth of Jesus..??”
(Are you freaking crazy..?? What the hell are you smoking..??)
No, the TRUE meaning of Christmas, Hollywood style, is...
Place Tim Allen in a “fat suit”, stick a beard on his face, call it “Santa Clause part 5", and make 100 million dollars at the box office.
OR...
You could re-due the movie: “A Christmas Carol.” You could stick Jim Carey into a cartoon and promise that this version will be totally different than the other 100 times this story has been told.
But the top movie this year is turning everyone GREEN, by turning us all blue.
Yes, we are talking about: “Avatar”, or as it is being called by some: “Dances with Smurfs.” (A cross between Kevin Costners’ “Dances with Wolves”, and those blue cartoon people called: “Smurfs.”)![]()
I’m sorry folks, but I just cannot get excited by a “cartoon.” Yes, I understand that it is in 3-D. And I understand that they spent 300 million to make this cartoon.
But it is still just a cartoon.
It’s not that I am old-fashion. I really enjoyed the newest “Star Trek” movie. But Star Trek used REAL humans for it’s main actors, they hired dozens of electricians and carpenters to modify sets, and create new visual images. Yes, Star Trek did use CGI computers for some scenes, however, they tried hard to keep it real.
I guess the time I spent living in LA taught me about the thousands of people who work behind the scenes in the movie business. The tons of people it took to build the sets, paint the background, wire up the explosions, etc.
I remember all of the actors who spent months physically training to not only “act the part”, but to “look” the part.
All of this gone, because the action takes place in a cartoon world.
The movie: “Beowulf” was the spoiler for me.
Beowulf took actress Angelina Jolie and turned her into a cartoon woman so that they could “physically enhance” her body.
Hollywood tried to “physically enhance” Angelina’s body..??
GOD ALREADY “PHYSICALLY ENHANCED” ANGELINA JOLIE..!!
There isn’t anything that you guys could have done with your cartoon computer, to improve Angelina.
However, the REAL insult with “Beowulf” was the hero.
Beowulf was this huge, physically fit, “Viking” type guy. (At least that is what you see in the movie.) The actor playing Beowulf is actually a pudgy, balding, dumpy looking guy. The type of guy that women would toss a beer on him after he made some perverted joke.
Hence, the future of Hollywood.
Actors no longer have to “look the part.” They only need to “sound good.” The CGI cartoon computers will fix the rest.)
Hollywood claims that “Avatar” is a BIG step forward in movie making.
I say it is a BIG step backwards. With Avatar, Hollywood has taken a step back to the old “radio days”, when you could only hear the actors, you never saw the actors.![]()
Let us NOT forget the special moral message for us humans, in the movie: Avatar- “Dances with Smurfs.”
WARNING- Spoiler alert
Avatar: The Moral Message
Humans are stupid, filthy, terrible people. They kill, or destroy everything that they come into contact with. The earth would be so much better if humans were gone. I hate those stupid humans. I wish I were a blue Smurf- like person with a tail and I lived in a tree.
THE END
In a comment on a post about the movie Avatar, a fan of the movie wrote this:
“..Destroying less technologically capable cultures has been done many times in the past and it's contemptible. That's what this movie is about: soulless avarice. Think about that the next time you drive by an Indian reservation..”
Well, I drive by a “Native Reservation” all the time. The “Seneca Nation of Native Americans” in NY State.
The Natives are very nice to me, there.
They have these HUGE buildings called: Casinos. The Natives are always asking me to come on in, because: “The winning is only the beginning.” They feature GREAT Native American bands like “ZZ Top” who play traditional Native songs like: “Give me all your loving” and “Cheep Sunglasses.”
Truth be told, Natives on the Reservation have a choice on how they want to live. They could pitch a tent and live in the forest. There are plenty of deer, bear, and fish to hunt and eat. A person could live out their life in the Allegheny Forest.
But you will not see many tents set up in Seneca. Because modern Natives CHOOSE to live- modern. Why..??
I happen to live in the heart of the Amish community in Pennsylvania. The Amish have shunned modern technologies and they live the way people lived in the 1800's. (Right..??)
Do you know what the popular toys for Amish kids are..??
In-line roller skates and skate boards. Amish boys are very good at skateboarding.
I will never forget the first time I saw an Amish guy with a cell phone, brief case, and calculator. I thought: “What the heck..?? Don’t Amish people shun stuff like this..??
This Amish man builds houses for a living and the Amish community Elders allow him to use the cell phone because he employees most of the men in his community. (However, he is not allowed to drive a car. He must pay someone to drive him.)
I laugh as I drive by an Amish community and see an Amish woman using a gas powered weed wacker to trim the lawn. (Hey, it’s a hell of a lot easier then using a sickle and trimming by hand.)
Stop into any Wal- Mart in Amish country and you will see the Amish children standing in front of the HUGE flat- screen TV’s. Their eyes fixated on the images displayed.
The Hollywood Liberal would be disgusted by what I just said. I could picture the Hollywood liberal saying:
“..The Amish live a pure life without all those carbon creating devices. And look at those EVIL TV sets corrupting the young Amish children..”
Yet, the Hollywood Liberal makes a living from those “evil TV sets,” and movies like Avatar.
I do not see it the way that the Hollywood Liberal sees it. I see human nature being played out.
When I see an Amish woman, with a huge smile on her face; and in her shopping cart is a sewing machine, I realize that her life has just become MUCH easier. The community Elders must have allowed her to get electricity and a sewing machine. No longer will she have to make hundreds of shirts by hand with needle and thread.
Human nature is curiosity. The ability to find better ways to make life easier. To do anything otherwise, is to shun human nature.
Movies like Avatar, by design, are built to fill young children with guilt. Humans are such evil creatures. If only we could be like those blue Smurf creatures. We could sit around and tell stories all day. We could eat and sleep. And when we are board, we could use a USB computer cable and plug ourselves into our pet and become “as one” with our pets.
Well, I have a cat. I am not sure that I want to use a computer cable to plug myself into my cat. There is a very good chance that his little head is empty and he is not thinking of anything. Or, he might be thinking: “Get off the couch and feed me, then go away and leave me alone. You are the reason I cannot have sex anymore, you beast. Getting me fixed. WHAT WERE YOU THINKING..??”
Plugging into our pets might not be a good idea.
So Avatar “The Movie” is there to fill us full of guilt, this Holiday Season.
There is not a White child alive today, who forced a Native person off of his land.
But yet, we MUST fill children’s heads with guilt because White people did, long ago.
There is not a Native child alive today who was forced off of his land by White people. But yet, we MUST fill this Native child’s head with anger because long ago, someone did force his people off of their land. “What purpose does this anger serve..??
There is not a White child alive today who ever kept a Black man as a slave. And yet, we MUST fill this child’s head with guilt, because it happened long ago.
There is not a Black child alive today who was held as a slave. Yet, we MUST fill this Black child’s head with anger because White people did this, long ago. How will this anger help this child..??
There is not a child alive today who built that smokey factory that sits up on the hill. Yet, we MUST fill that child’s head with guilt because this child is “killing the earth.”
We MUST fill our children’s heads with GUILT and ANGER.
Why..??
Children cannot even go to a movie without being “preached to”, and filled with guilt.
This Christmas, I would like to apologize to all of the young people out there. I am very sorry that my generation is so screwed in the head..!!
It’s no wonder that young people walk around with i-pod headphones on listening to their music, and they stay connected with each other by phone, with text messages. THEY ARE TRYING TO TUNE OUT all the idiots from my generation. All the guilt and anger that my generation wants to pile on them.
It’s no wonder that young people rush home to play video games.
If I had to listen to the assholes from my generation preaching guilt and anger, I would try and escape into a “video game world” too.
Kids, I’m not sure what happened to my generation..??
We were Hippies who preached FREEDOM, love, and peace.
Today, my generation preaches guilt.
Guilt, because you children are destroying the earth. Guilt, because long ago, people were “mean” to each other.
Guilt that when you turn 16 and want to drive a car, you will be killing a polar bear, just by driving that car.
This Christmas, I want to make a promise to young people out there...
There are millions of folks who believe like I do.
I promise, for as long as I am able, I; and millions like me, will try and rid the world of the “guilt police.”
You deserve to have what we had when we grew up. A chance to live and love life without all this freaking guilt and anger that my generation wants to fill your head with.
So, hang in there my young friends. Download a few more songs to get by and it will not be long.
Soon, we will rid the earth of the “guilt police” and we can get back to loving life. We can get back to feeling good about being human.
Which is what Christmas is all about, in my opinion.
Modern democrats are old-time republicans, and Lincoln was a liberal
Every so often you will hear a theory that makes you go: “Hhhmmm.”
It seems like a harmless theory, and when you first hear it; you wonder why anyone would take the time to ponder the details of this theory.
However, when you see the theory being used in principle (or as fact), you then realize that this is NO harmless theory. In fact, it is a blatant attempt to re-write history.
Here is the theory:
Republicans and Democrats have “switched” their ideologies. It happened around the beginning of the 20 century.
On the surface, this theory seems harmless and feels more a sophomoric exercise that would force young students to look at American history.
At face value, you might even buy into this theory because Republican President Theodore Roosevelt was “kind of” liberal. And JFK would be conservative, by today’s standards.
It is when you see liberal / progressives use this theory, that you realize the changing of history that this theory eludes to.
Why would liberals create this theory..??
What good does it serve..??
The answer is simple.
(Now folks, I am going to ask you to do something here that could appear on an episode of “Mike Rowe’s- Dirty Jobs.”)
Picture that you are a liberal democrat.
You belong to the “party of the people.”
You are a democrat.
How does it feel to know that YOUR party: The Democrats, fought in a war to keep Black people as slaves. (And that was only 150 years ago.)
How could the “party of the people” fight to keep Black people as slaves..??
Gee...
Wouldn’t it be nice if there was some kind of theory that claims that the two political parties “switched”, and it was actually those EVIL republicans who fought for slavery? THAT WOULD BE GREAT..!!
(Stay in character folks, we have got a couple more examples to do.)
You are a progressive democrat.
You are in a debate about American patriotism.
How does it feel to know that your party: The Democrats; is the only American political party to fight in a war to BREAK UP the United States..??
(Maybe my history is a little to “ancient” for you? Let’s move closer in time, shall we?)
You are a liberal / progressive. You detest war.
How does it feel to know that your party: The Democrats; are the only group of people on the face of the earth- to use nuclear weapons to kill people? The Russians and the Chinese have never killed people with nuclear weapons, but your democrat party did kill people with “the bomb.”
Wouldn’t it be GREAT if there was some kind of theory that stated that the two political parties “switched” their ideologies. That would mean that those EVIL republicans did all those “bad things” and President Lincoln was a liberal..!! That would make us liberals feel all warm and fuzzy..!!
As liberals often do...
If there isn’t a theory out there that serves their purpose. The liberals make one up.
(Which is what liberals did.)
Now, I’m not going to name- names here because the names are unimportant and I have heard this theory from several sources.
The reason that I am doing an editorial on this is because it is a blatant attempt to re-write history.
OK, let’s prove this theory wrong in three examples.
For this theory to be correct: both parties would have had to switched their “overall” political goals. In reality, in history, this never happened.
Let’s start at the most often sited case:
(Example one) JFK- Most people would agree that JFK was more conservative than the modern liberal. He was tough on defense, he took no crap from the communists, and JFK cut taxes.
You could point to this example and say: “Something must have switched here because JFK was more like a republican.”
However, for there to be a “true” switch of political ideologies, the republicans of that day would have had to become liberal. THAT DID NOT HAPPEN.
The TOP republicans in 1960- 63 (JFK’s era) were Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon. (Goldwater ran for president in 1964. Nixon ran again in 1968.)
I will personally come to your house and smack you in the face if you tell me that Barry Goldwater was a liberal.
And I am VERY certain that most liberals do not want to claim that Nixon belongs in their democrat party.
So the historical facts do not prove this theory, (using JFK.) There was no party switch.
The only thing that happened was for that short time in history: Democrats moved to the center with JFK; and republicans moved further Right with Goldwater.
(Example TWO) President Teddy Roosevelt.
I have heard many people claim that Teddy Roosevelt was “more like” a democrat. Even Glenn Beck once stated that Teddy Roosevelt was a progressive. “Mr. Beck, with all due respect, you are VERY wrong about that.”
If you read Theodore Roosevelt’s biography, you will find that Theodore didn’t consider himself being a republican OR democrat.
In my opinion, Theodore Roosevelt was the last of the true “ GeorgeWashington type” presidents; (in that) once he became president, he no longer belonged to any political party.
Theodore was a true Independent. More democrat than republican: by today’s standards. Theodore went after BIG companies like JP Morgan, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Mellon, and the likes.
President Theodore Roosevelt did help to create the National Parks system in America. He also started a type of wildlife protection act.
On the surface, one could say that something MUST have changed here, because Theodore doesn’t sound like any republican that I know of.
However, for there to be a TRUE ideological switch in the political parties; the democrats of that day would have to be acting conservative.
The FACTS do not prove that.
The next democrat president after Theodore Roosevelt was: Woodrow Wilson.
If you try and claim that Woodrow Wilson was a “conservative / republican”; Wilson will crawl out of his grave, come to your house, and slap you in the face.
By most accounts, Woodrow Wilson is viewed as “the father of the progressive movement in America.” President Wilson created the “progressive income tax” and Wilson signed on with the “League of Nations”, which entered us into globalization.
The facts do not prove that America experienced a political- ideological “switch” during Theodore Roosevelt’s day.
What the facts show is that during that brief time in history: republicans moved to the center with Theodore Roosevelt; and democrats moved further LEFT with Woodrow Wilson.
There was no ideological switch.
(Example THREE) “The nail in the coffin of the ‘switched’ theory.”
For you to prove that American politics experienced an ideological switch; that old-time republicans are now modern democrats, and old-time democrats are now modern republicans...
You MUST prove that Abe Lincoln was a liberal democrat.
(Good luck with that..!!)
Irony has a way of being VERY ironic.
When this “switched” theory was last presented to me; I had just finished a biography of President Lincoln.
Sorry, but President Lincoln was VERY much conservative.
I’m going to be very brief here because you could write a book about Lincoln. (That’s a little joke, at liberal’s expense. People HAVE written books about Lincoln. You should read them.)
Lincoln was the poorest man to become president, at that time. Matter of fact, some people wondered if Lincoln was too “common” to be an American president.
Lincoln grew up with traditional conservative values. You worked hard for your money. There were no free rides. Lincoln worked as a “rail- splitter”, making fence posts; and Lincoln worked on steamboats- loading cargo. All the while, Lincoln taught himself law by reading legal reference.
What caused Lincoln to drop the legal profession and enter politics was that his adopted state on Illinois was contemplating allowing slaves to be used within the state. Even as a young man, Lincoln detested slavery. He truly believed that all men where created equal.
Democrats were pushing hard to allow slaves to be used in Illinois. Not that Illinois would become a “slave state”, but that slave owners from another state could bring their slaves into Illinois for loading wagons, gathering crops, etc.
Lincoln joined the Whig party because the Whig Party opposed the expansion of slavery into other states. The Whig Party is often referred to as the BIG money party because it was often backed by large northern companies. Lincoln bounced between politics and the legal profession, during those years. (1834-1854)
But a dramatic change happened...
The Whig Party; in an attempt to keep the United States together, made a deal with Democrats. “If southern democrats would vow to stay in the Union, the issue of ending slavery would be dropped from the national debate.
This sickened millions of Americans, including Abe Lincoln.
This one act; caused the downfall of the Whig Party, and expanded a new party, called: The Republican Party.
This is where we will leave the story of President Lincoln. (Because you should already know the rest of the story: Lincoln rises up in The republican party. We have the famous Lincoln- Douglas debates. Lincoln wins the presidency. The Civil War. And slavery is ended in America.)
Abe Lincoln was VERY much a conservative. That is how he was raised. As a lawyer, Lincoln represented BIG railroad companies and river boat lines. Lincoln never believed in welfare. Lincoln believed in protectionism which helped American companies grow. Lincoln never believed in personal income tax. Lincoln was a republican. The first republican president. Facts are facts.
I can understand why liberals would create a theory that the political parties “switched” during the 20 century, because it would be great to have Lincoln in your “win” column.
And, least we forget...
You could blame those EVIL republicans for trying to expand slavery.
This theory is nothing more than an attempt at re-writing history. Liberals are not happy with the historical facts about their “beloved” Democrat Party; so liberals create a NEW history.
I hate to see liberals so distraught that they must resort to fabricating history. So my good nature has caused me to make a deal with you liberals.
If you REALLY want to swap history with us republicans, here is what I offer.
First, you are NOT getting President Lincoln. Abe Lincoln is our guy and the FIRST republican. You can’t have him.
However, I am willing to give you Teddy Roosevelt, in exchange for JFK.
JFK was GOOD. But his face is not up on Mount Rushmore like Teddy Roosevelt’s is. So you must sweeten this deal a little.
We republicans get JFK. In return, we will give you Teddy Roosevelt, BUT: you must also take President Nixon off of our hands.
How is that for a political Ideological switch..??
Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic
Comments:
intrudermarine on Thursday December 17th 2009 at 7:28am
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gregscommonsense on Thursday December 17th 2009 at 8:02am
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
AngryRepublican on Saturday December 19th 2009 at 12:10pm
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
winning on Saturday December 19th 2009 at 12:29pm
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well, thank you, Winning!
I see your point, however I do not agree on any ideological switch.
I can trace the democrat model of governing from Wilson’s (income tax) to FDR’s (New Deal) to Johnson’s (Great Society) to Clinton’s attempt at national health care, to Obama’s national health care. It almost travels in a straight line with the exception of JFK veering to the right.
A fellow once demonstrated that you can trace these two ideologies back to Hamilton and Jefferson. You can follow these two ideologies like two lines on a graph. Every so often, one line will head to the center, but it will usually head back. They never really switch sides.
I didn’t attempt to trace it back to Hamilton and Jefferson here on this post because I’m not that smart. You have to weed through the “Whig” party, and the “Federalists”, and the “National Democratic- Republican” party.
That would give me a headache..!!
AngryRepublican on Saturday December 19th 2009 at 3:42pm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SimplyTrace on Wednesday December 16th 2009 at 3:37pm
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chasing Orgasms
OK, the title of this post might be a bit deceptive.
Most of my editorial has little to do with orgasms. I noticed that posts which have an erotic title seem to get a lot of hits, (and you MUST have a lot of “hits”) so there you have it.
Today, we have a BIG topic to go over and I am excited to talk about it. But first I must mention that we have had to accept advertising here at The Angry Republic. The goofy pictures that we do and writing up all of this “stuff” COSTS money. So, to offset these costs we will be placing commercials on this site. But I promise, you will hardly notice them.
OK, our topic today is “hypocrisy.”
Hypo Crisy- is a Latin term, meaning: “Hypo” (or Hippo) a large African animal; and “Crisy”- the dingy blond on the TV show “Three’s Company.”
In modern times, we have dropped the Latin version of the word: Hypocrisy; and it simply means someone who THINKS that they are a “Mac Daddy”, but in reality they cannot even afford a Big Mac.
Remember when liberals claimed that President Bush “cherry picked” intelligence reports on Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction, so that Bush could take us to war in Iraq.
Liberals claimed that there was evidence “out there” that showed that Saddam had no WMD’s. But, Bush ignored this “evidence” and rushed us to war. (Remember liberals saying that stuff..??)
Well, today; we have PROOF that some of the climate scientists “tricked numbers” to make it look like the earth is getting warmer DUE TO man’s activities.
They “faked” temperature readings..!!
At the same time, you have “other” climate scientists who are telling us to disregard “those” scientists who faked the numbers. Man is making the earth warm up, and they are telling us to “hurry up and pass” massive global warming laws. (Before it is too late.)
How can one be right and the other is wrong..??
How can it be wrong for Bush to pick the information that he likes, to take us to war.
But it is justified and right for scientists to pick the information that they like to rush us into laws that will hurt the poorest people. Raising electricity bills. High transportation costs…
It is hypocrisy for the Left to claim that we should have investigated the WMD situation better BEFORE we went to war, but yet the Left doesn’t want to investigate man made global warming further EVEN THOUGH we have proof that some scientists faked data.
I want to get more into this because these new laws will effect everyone, but first; we have one of those commercials that I mentioned earlier.
It will only take a second, and we will be right back with this topic.
HI, I’m Walter Dickman; president of the American Civil Liberties Union, (the ACLU).
Recently, because of bad economic times, the ACLU has lost 19 million dollars in donations. (At least, we think it was because of the “bad” economy, what else could it be..??)
This lost of donations will have a devastating effect on your liberal civilities(??). Without this 19 million dollars, how will we ever sue small towns for having a plastic Jesus in their city park..??
The loss of this 19 million dollars could mean that the ACLU can no longer shut down a small business because they forgot to fill out the federal form: “AL-1645-98759″ before they fired a worker for stealing. (I mean, come on..?? Stealing is stealing. You are always going to have employees that steal from you. But forgetting to file the federal form: “AL-1645-98759″, THAT IS A CRIME.)
But I digress, here at the ACLU, we need your help..!! This is usually our busy season with “The Holidays” approaching. Normally, we would have 6 law suits going against LARGE department stores because they forced their employees to say: “Merry Christm…” (Auugh.. I can’t say that phrase. It’s too horrid.)
Please, won’t you help?
Send all the money you can to the ACLU. Do it today, so we can get back to the business, of putting Americans out of business.
As I told you before, these new commercials that we are running on The Angry Republic will not be a nuisance.
You will hardly notice them.
Where were we before the commercial..??
Oh..yea.. School Lunches
As far as bacteria safety and nutritional value, the food that the government serves our children is worse then what they would get at Jack in the Box, or KFC.
Welcome to the future of government run health care.
How long has the government run the school system..?? And we find out today that the government is serving our children meat and chicken that would be rejected by Burger King..??
And the government has to audacity to tell us that the “high quality” of health care will still be there, when they manage it.
Hell, the government has been serving our children low quality food for years. How could we EVER trust anything that they say after finding this out.
And why would we ever give the government MORE power..??
I want to really explore this topic because it pisses me off, but first; we have another one of those commercials.
I promise, we will return to this topic after the break.
Hi, we are concerned members of Hollywood, and we have an important message for you.
Each year, millions of Honey Bees and Mud Ducks are dying. They are dying because they cannot find their way home.
Your cell phone is causing the Honey Bees and the Mud Ducks to be confused. They become disoriented and lost. AND THEY DIE.
You can help by turning OFF your cell phone and never using your cell phone unless you are being raped or murdered.
We call this campaign: “Just turn it off, stupid. Become unconnected.”
In the future, you might see a few of us “Hollywood types” still using our cell phones, but we have to because we are important. We have to stay connected to the Hollywood studios about important movies and books that we have written. But you, you have nothing that is important to talk about. You would just use your cell phone to blab to some goofy friend: “Blah, blah, blah.”
SO TURN OFF THAT CELL PHONE.
Save the Mud Ducks.
And you might just get a cell phone call from one of us BIG celebrities, thanking you.
(Except, you will never know because you will have your cell phone turned off.)
Now you must excuse us, we must fire- up the carbon spewing “private jets” and fly to Copenhagen for the global warming “after- party” event. Thousands of us have burned tons of jet fuel to get to Copenhagen this year. We are here to force you “little people” to use less energy.
Global Warming is very important, besides; this year they have free prostitutes for us delegates.
Maybe I was wrong about these commercials “not interfering” in the pace of my site..??
“Free hookers for global warming people..??”
Tea Bag Parties never needed “free hookers”..?? What’s up with that..??
OK, before the commercial break, we were talking about global warming hookers.
I think it is wrong for any global warming hooker to force her (or his) “life choices” on the rest of us.
In a free country, you should be able to choose how much you conserve energy, or if you want to give your body to strangers for free.
Global warming hookers really tick me off, and I want to get more into that subject. But first, we have another quick commercial, and we will wrap up this editorial on “global warming hookers”.
Read the NEW book: “Barack Obama- The GREATEST president EVER”
YOU MUST BUY THIS BOOK..!!
NBC News said: “This book is.. ..I pissed my pants.”
MSNBC said: “After reading this book, there are things crawling up my leg.”
You MUST read the NEW book: “Barack Obama- The GREATEST president EVER”
In bookstores, everywhere.
We are back, to wrap up this editorial.
In conclusion, it is like I said earlier in this post…
Say goodbye to Tiger Woods..!!
Say hello to Natalie Gulbis..!!
I have always felt that women in sports should get more national attention..!!
THAT is the whole point of this editorial…
If Tiger Woods had spent MORE time with his family, and less time “chasing orgasms”, he would have…
“Chasing Orgasms”
Hey, that would be a great title for an editorial..!!
I will have to write one with that title, someday.
Coming soon to
The Angry Republic
American JOBS- Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, tell us what to do..??

We Americans got some good news recently, as the unemployment figures DROPPED from 10.2 %- to 10%.
I remain skeptical though, because in the business that I am in, I know this may only be temporary.
Yes, I saw a lot of new people being trained for new jobs. However, I know that come January and February, many of these “new faces” will be gone.
They are commonly called: Seasonal employees, who are picked up for the Christmas shopping season. Only a few, who show drive and determination, will remain in that job after the holidays.
Still, it is good news because the unemployment figures could have gotten worse.
Can we live with 10% unemployment..??
Can we live with one out of every ten people in America out of work..??
And let’s not forget, how many people are “under-employed”? How many people are working a job that they are vastly over- qualified for, but they settle for what they have because there is nothing else out there?I still believe that JOBS and the economy are the most important issue that we face today. Hence, we march forward with our editorial series on JOBS.
We need to return “industry” back to America. We do not “make” anything, anymore.When trying to find a solution to the economic problems that we face today, the debate usually unfolds like this:
(Here is an example debate between the liberal progressive and the conservative:)
“It was those dam democrats: Barney Frank and Chris Dodd who caused this crisis. They were in charge of banking.”
“Oh, yea; what about President Bush and the republicans? They were in charge of the government for 6 years and did nothing.”
Is that so, well it was the democrats during Carter and Clinton that PUT people in houses that they couldn’t afford.”“Really, well it was Reaganomics that de-regulated everything and caused this crisis because banks went nuts giving out crappy loans that hurt people.”
“You suck, it was Carter who set the country on this socialistic path and taxes are so high that people cannot pay their bills.”
“You idiot, it was Nixon who...”
At this point, if you folks would like to go get a sandwich and maybe a beverage, you have plenty of time. I guaranty that this fight will still be taking place when you return.
Might I suggest an ice cold soda pop and a baloney sandwich?
Sounds tasty..!!
OK, let’s rejoin this debate between the liberal and the conservative, on what caused the current bad economy.
“You perverted fool, it was Jefferson who taxed people so that he could beef up his Navy.”
“Don’t call me a perverted fool you sick bastard, it was Adams who couldn’t decide if he was for a bigger government or a smaller one.”
“Oh, yea; well it was George Washington who...”
OK, let’s leave this debate between the liberal and the conservative. (You get the point.)
BOTH political party’s had a fair share in causing this economic crisis that we are in today.

And it will take both: conservatives and liberals to fix it.
In my last editorial on JOBS, we talked about the only solution that we can use to bring jobs back to America is with (taxes) tariffs.
We do not want to work for lower pay like in China, India, or Mexico.
We could relax environmental laws somewhat, but we do not want to pollute the air and water.
However, if we remove all taxes from products that are “truly” made in America, while raising “tariffs” on all imports; we could bring industry back to America.One stumbling block to tariffs is the belief that:
“You cannot mess with the free market. If government screws with capitalism, we are doomed to fail as a nation.”
Well, that might not necessarily be true. Let’s start at the beginning.
American JOBS- Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton; tell us what to do?

From the beginning, the Colonies in the New World were supplied by European ships carrying goods from foreign lands.
Sure, we built our own houses and grew our own food; but we imported most other things. (Clothing material, iron works, mechanical devices, etc.)
It was apparent after the Revolutionary War, that America NEEDED it’s own industry.
Joined together in the fight for freedom; Jefferson, Adams, and Hamilton were united. After the war, they could agree on little.
Jefferson wanted a smaller federal government with powerful “states rights” and personal freedom.
Hamilton wanted a larger federal government with “laws and order” and a powerful Navy.
Adams was stuck somewhere in between and spent his time trying to hold America together by appeasing both sides.
George Washington didn’t belong to any political party and after the Revolutionary War, Washington just wanted to go home and do some fishing. (Smart guy..!!)
One thing that all these men could agree on was that the federal government would have to raise money. But how..??
The founding fathers knew that they couldn’t impose personal taxes, they had just fought a war to get away from that. Yet, they knew that the federal government could not survive by charity. (Politicians working for free, states- banding together to donate materials and labor to build Navy ships, etc.)
Being resourceful, the founding fathers always looked for ways to solve two problems with one solution. And America had 3 BIG problems to solve:
(One) The federal government needed funds
(Two) America needed industry. We didn’t “make” many things in America. (Sound familiar..??)
(Three) The Southern States had “slave” labor. How could any Northern business compete with Southern States that had very low labor costs? (Also, very familiar with our situation today. Low labor costs of goods made in China, Mexico, etc.)
The founding fathers solution was ingenious and simple:
Tax (tariff) all goods that arrive by ship.
This solution solved all three problems.
The federal government received the money it needed to survive. Yet, it didn’t tax individual Americans, personally.
The tax was high enough that it forced some European companies to move to America and set up shop. Also, enterprising Americans ventured into business on their own.
And, the South couldn’t bombard the North with cheap goods made from slave labor because these goods arrived up North, from the South, by ship; thereby receiving the shipping tariff. (It was almost impossible to ship large amounts of goods over land in those days.)
The tariff was the solution that solved our problems in those early days. The tariff ranged from a low 5%, all the way up to a high of 50%, in 1828.
You could almost tell who controlled congress by how high the tariff was.
When southern democrats (“Democrat- Republicans” as they were called back then) controlled the congress, they would lower the tariff to “help the southern states compete in the global market.”
When a northern member of the “Whig Party” controlled congress, the tariff would rise to “protect northern states from unfair advantages that ‘other’ countries have over America.”
The tariff fluctuated like that until President Lincoln and the abolishment of slavery. Now, the south didn’t have an unfair labor advantage. President Lincoln had to impose a 49% tariff to fund the Civil War. After the Civil War, with the south no longer demanding the lower tariff, the tariff remained high.
With this HIGH “protection tariff” in place, American industry became one of the best in the world.
By the 1900's, the British newspaper: “The Daily Mail”, declared: “We have lost to the American manufacturer. (We have lost) electrical machinery, locomotives, steel rails, and agriculture machinery, the pride and backbone of the British engineering industry.”America had become an industrial giant.
However, greed has a way of poking it’s ugly head into our lives.
American politicians (and large companies) began to believe that if America lowered it’s tariff, (and other countries lowered theirs) American manufacturers could make EVEN MORE MONEY selling goods overseas.
Enter- The era of Free Trade and low Tariffs
President Woodrow Wilson believed in low tariffs. With the advent of the “income tax”, the federal government no longer needed a high tariff to run the country. Income tax provided the government with plenty of money.
America experienced a great industrial boom.
This is where, (I believe) the notion was formed that: “trade MUST be free from tariffs, for American industry to grow”.
It is important to remember that Europe went through WW1. The “Old World’s” industry was devastated from this war. American goods would have been bought by foreign nations REGARDLESS of the tariff rate. Other nations had little choice. WW1 and WW2 crippled these nations.Now, I’m NOT saying that we should have taxed “the crap” out of people who were suffering. I’m saying that “Free Trade” wasn’t the only catalyst for our economic growth.
None the less- free trade, low tariffs, and world trade policies became the normal for democrats and republicans alike.
Enter- globalization, the new world order, and “It’s a small world after all.”America chugged along pretty good after WW2. That is, until...
American labor unions demanded HIGHER pay for it’s workers.
Americans demanded cleaner air, clearer water.
We wanted safer jobs.
And WHY NOT..!!
(We deserve it.) We work hard..!!
And, from the safety of our front porches, we all watched as the textile industry left American shores. We do not make clothing material here, anymore.
We all watched as the steel industry left America, and set up shop in some foreign land.We all laughed at the first Japanese made TV sets. They were made with plastic shells. “Who would buy one ..??”, we said. American made television sets were framed in wood. They were BIG, heavy, scary looking things and it took four guys to move one. Today, you cannot find an American made TV.
We scratched our heads when we saw the first “small” foreign cars zipping by on American highways. Today, foreign cars make up nearly 45% of the vehicles sold in America.
We do not “make” anything, anymore.
We sell things. We service things.But we do not make anything, anymore.
Some argue that “free markets” are what built America.
Others debate that “protectionism” allowed America to become strong.
I argue that it was a delicate balance between the two, that made America strong.
Protectionism of the 1800's allowed American industry to become strong and excel in the “free markets” of the 1900's.
The key is knowing when to “protect” and when to “free” the markets.
If ever there was a time to protect our industry, it is the present.
We need to learn from the founding fathers, for they went through the same thing that we are experiencing today.
We need to lower or remove all federal, state, and local taxes from anything “made” in America. And raise taxes on all imported goods. This will force industry back to America.It worked for the founding fathers. There is no reason why it will not work again, today.
Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic
This concludes our 4th editorial on American JOBS. If you are interested in this topic and you missed the first 3 parts, I have links below.
The next editorial on American JOBS will deal with the next level of business for returning jobs to America.
We know what the problem is, we have a solution, and we have looked at the constitutionality of this solution. (Hell, the founding fathers did it, so it MUST be legal.)

Next, we need to start to implement this solution. I will need your help and your impute. We need to find politicians who also believe that American JOBS are the most important issue of the day.
I do not care if this politician is an independent, republican, or democrat. The issue of American JOBS rises above political parties.
If we cannot find a politician who supports the issue of American JOBS, then we will create one. (After all, these politicians work for us.)
But, that is for our next editorial, called:
American JOBS part 5- Taking the First Step

Past editorials on American JOBS
American JOBS part 1- What went wrong
American JOBS part 2- Safety First
American JOBS part 3- The Solution
American JOBS part 4- Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, tell us what to do
(You just read that one)
American JOBS part 5- Taking the First Step
(Due out in a couple of weeks)
Thanks for reading
President Obama gave a “long awaited” speech last night, a speech that cuts like a knife, and seems to separate the “men” from the “boys.”
(OK, it probably doesn’t separate “men” from “boys”, I just put that in there to sound tough.)
However, President Obama’s speech cuts like a knife through the political parties.
Liberal / Progressives
From Michael Moore writing an editorial that made a last- ditch effort to persuade Obama NOT to expand this war, to the Huffington Post declaring this a “War Reborn.” Liberals wanted us out of BOTH wars, and they are not happy about this build-up.
Progressives are happy that there is a time- line for leaving Afghanistan, BUT NOT THE BUILD UP. Some have even said that Obama is following Bush’s war policies. “Bush’s third term.” Some are asking where are all the “anti-war” protesters who showed up in numbers during Bush’s presidency.
(Yea, I would like to know that too..?? Where are the anti-war protesters?)
Conservative / Republicans
Are NOT happy about the time- line, and they may not be happy about the lower number of extra troops being sent, but they are happy that something is finally being done.
Conservatives are not happy with the mention of “war costs.” If you spend billions to bailout banks and car companies, what the hell is the difference?
If you are fighting a war, you fight to win. Who cares about the costs
Moderates / Indy’s / middle of the “political” road people
Many are happy that the US troops will get some help, and they have believed for awhile that we cannot stay in Afghanistan forever. Moderates, that I have listened to, seem happy about Obama’s speech last night.
More so, than any other issue that we currently have going, this issue cuts right down party lines and it separates the moderates.
You could almost gauge where you are on the political spectrum, by how you feel about President Obama’s Afghan plan.
I have felt for some time that President Obama was taking TOO LONG to make up his mind. “Either we fight to win: give the commanders what they need; or we get the hell out of Afghanistan. This ‘holding pattern’ that Obama put us in for months is killing young Americans.”
I may have been wrong with my opinion on the president, for taking too long.
General David Petraeus (who I admire and respect) defended President Obama, saying: “We needed this extra time to sharpen our plan, to place in Afghanistan the best possible effort to achieve our goals.”
If President Obama is truly listening to General Petraeus, then I owe Barack Obama an apology. For I have no doubt that General Petraeus has our military, and our country’s BEST interests in mind.
It is equally important that we remember that many liberals cut General Petraeus down before they even knew the man. (Remember; “General Petraeus, don’t betray us.” The NY Times ad put out by Move on.)
On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program, General Petraeus was asked: “Is VP Cheney WRONG for saying that Obama was ‘dithering?”
Petraeus gracefully said: “I didn’t hear the Vice President’s comments, so I have no opinion.”
Here is a man who is not going to get involved in “left- right” politics. He didn’t start these wars. But he has a job to do. To win battles and keep America safe.
If I owe an apology to President Obama, then many on the left owe an apology to General Petraeus. He just defended your president.
General Petraeus is fine with the July 2011 date that was set, because: “This date of July 2011 is not the end of a process, but the beginning of a process of turning control and security over to the Afghan people.”
Petraeus also said: “We will begin to pull out of Afghanistan when conditions on the ground warrant this. July 2011 begins this process.”
The three major problems that I have had with the Afghanistan War have been answered with President Obama’s speech last night.
(One) Our troops will get the help that they need.
(Two) President Obama IS listening to his generals.
(Three) We will not pull out of Afghanistan unless the country is stable.
These are “baby steps”, folks.
President Obama took “baby steps” in our direction.
The alcoholic who is trying to stay sober, but falls off the wagon and gets piss drunk, shouldn’t be kicked to the curb. You dust him off, pat him on the back, and encourage him to keep trying to stay sober.
When a liberal has a moment of realism, you must also give him encouragement so that he might stay in the world of reality.
Let’s put it another way…
How would Reverend Wright feel about President Obama’s Afghan policy..??
How would Bill Ayers feel about Obama’s choice..??
We already know how the far left progressives feel about this choice.
President Obama went against everything that he once believed to make this choice.
He deserves a pat on the back.
I do not agree with everything that president Obama said. However, there is no doubt that this was a step in the RIGHT direction.
This gives me hope that we can STOP the “cap and trade” bill.
Could it be that there is still hope with the health care bill?
Maybe President Obama IS delivering “hope” to the people.
Albeit, NOT the people who thought that they would receive this HOPE.
Today, I am hopeful.
However, many on the left believe that Obama is digging a hole that he will never escape.
Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic
Picture having a wonderful Thanksgiving. A beautiful day that the family can share.
At 2:45am on Friday, in he middle of the night, you decide to take a drive. (It happens to all of us.) However, your $100,000 dollar SUV slams into a fire hydrant and hits the neighbor’s tree.

Luckily, your wife was standing by (in the middle of the night, in the middle of the yard) with a golf club in her hand, and she smashes the windows out and sets you free.
(This kind of thing happens all the time. I have had many girlfriends who would go out in the yard, in the middle of the night, with a golf club, and stand there- waiting for “something” to happen.)
Unfortunately, now you have every media outlet in America camped out at your house. These “news” people want to know if you are cheating on your wife?
Tiger Woods needs your help.
The American media wants to PROVE that Tiger Woods cheated on his wife, Elin Nordegren:

and had an affair with this woman: Rachel Uchitel.
(Wow, looking at those two girls is almost like watching one of those Russ Meyer films. Tiger Woods, what’s up with that..??)
Tiger Woods needs your help.
Tiger doesn’t need your money. You do not have enough money to score a meeting with Mr. Woods, much less help him financially. However, Tiger Woods needs an alibi.
If you have a good alibi; like: “Tiger Woods wasn’t bedding down with that stunning- full figured- blond, Woods was at my house reading the Bible”, please send your alibi to:
“Save Tiger Woods foundation”
Remember, if Tiger Woods’ name is tarnish from this, the golfing world may never recover..!!
If you will not do it for Tiger Woods; do it for all the “little golfers” out there who could become jaded from golfing’s “evil side” and turn to another sport, like: hockey.
Please, won’t you help the “little golfers.”
Our next story that will tug at your heart and empty your purse is about Sen. John Kerry.
Senator Kerry, who is the head of President Obama’s “War Committee.” (Or whatever they call themselves?) Maybe it is called: “The man- made disaster committee”, I’m not really sure? (I know that they do not like the term “war.”)
Anyway; Sen. Kerry says that we missed our chance to capture (or kill) Osama bin Laden in December, 2001.
(Aaahh, and this news, because..??)
LINK: Kerry says we missed our chance.
Sen. Kerry says that if we had only sent MORE conventional troops in those early days of the war (oopps- “man- made disaster”), we would have captured bin Laden.
Here’s the problem:
John Kerry was a senator during 2001 and NOWHERE do you find Sen. Kerry asking for MORE troops in 2001.
In fact, Kerry; who was running for re-election in 2002, was calling for action against Saddam and Iraq, because Kerry felt that Saddam was a threat.
So, you see the problem.
Today, John Kerry claims MORE troops would have been better in Afghanistan in 2001. Yet Kerry was against adding MORE troops in Iraq with the “surge.” And Kerry is against adding more troops in Afghanistan today. Kerry favors smaller: “Special Op’s” forces in Afghanistan today. (Which is kind of what we did in 2001.)
Hence, John Kerry’s problem.
He needs someone to help him with public relations.
Someone like...
Maybe- Glenn Beck.
Picture John Kerry explaining his modern theory, compared to his 2001 beliefs, then Kerry looks into the camera, smiles, and says: “..Maybe it’s me, I’m riddled with A.D.D. I’m a rodeo clown..”
Then Kerry could walk up to a chalkboard that has- Bush, Osama bin Laden, and Donald Rumsfeld’s names in little circles, on the chalkboard. Kerry could begin drawing lines that connect each name, while explaining the “one world order” theory.
(It could work..!!)
Sen. John Kerry NEEDS your help.
If you will not do it for Senator John Kerry, do it for all the “little Senators” out there who might become jaded by all of this and quit the senate, to play professional hockey.
Please: send all the money that you have, plus the names of any Glenn Beck impersonators, to:
Our final story today, is of a VERY serious nature.
Not only is this problem hurting a beloved earth creature...
It is having devastating consequences FOR ME.
(And I take stuff that happens to me, very personal.)
Ever since the “hacked” e-mails leaked out about “tricked” numbers on the temperature graphs for Climate Scientist’s “global warming theory”, people have quit sending in money to STOP global warming.
As many of you know, 3 years ago I started the “Polar Bear Raft Company.” 
Our goal: to save the polar bears by building rafts for the bears to live on when the Arctic ice melts.
How many polar bears did my company save in this three year period..??
It is very hard to tell, because: (one) polar bears are white, snow and ice is white, and they all freaking look the same. Unless you spray- paint numbers on the backs of the polar bears, you ain’t gonna know; and (two) I’m NOT traveling to the Arctic Circle to spray- paint numbers on the backs of polar bears. If I travel anywhere, it will be South, not North.
However, you can sure bet that the “Polar Bear Raft Company” saved a whole mess of polar bears.
LINK: More information on my Polar Bear Raft Company
Just because you learned that global warming might not be “man- made”, it doesn’t mean that you should STOP sending ME money..!!
Think of the poor polar bears.
Do the polar bears know that the climate scientists faked the global warming data..??
No..!!
Polar bears cannot read the news.
You MUST help the polar bears.
The most common donation is $200 bucks. However, if you are a cheap bastard who doesn’t really care for the polar bears, you can send less money. I guess that would be OK.
Remember, send cash. Polar bears are dying and we cannot wait for your check to clear the bank.
Send cash, and do it today. (Before the Bush “tax cuts for the rich” expire.)
Send all the cash you have, to:
Send me money today, before polar bears become jaded, and leave the Arctic Circle to head to Canada- to play professional hockey.
Written by AR babonie for The Angry Republic
Thanks for reading
The Angry Republic
I am thankful that Obama LOST the election, global warming hoax
It is that time once again that I take a moment to give “thanks” for the stuff that I am thankful for. (???) Not sure if that sentence makes sense?
I used to take this time of the year to talk about “The First Thanksgiving” and the myth that is taught in schools about what took place on that day.
That post usually leads to me spending Thanksgiving fighting with someone about the Native American and English settler’s relationship in the 1600’s. If you are interested in that topic, I have a link for you: (Feel free to comment on that post, if you like.)
But today, I wanted to talk about things that I am thankful for, right now. Of course I am thankful for good health, and I have plenty of work in this bad economy. I am thankful for that, everyday (not just today.)
Today, I am thankful that someone hacked into the Climate Research Unit’s computers and snagged a bunch of e-mails that PROVE that “man- made global warming” is a hoax.
Hacking into someone’s computer is wrong, and in most cases; should be punished. However, these climate scientists were very close to deleting important information that proves that facts have been falsified to make man-made global warming look real.
By law, this information SHOULD have been released by the “freedom of information act”. But the climate scientist were trying to claim international status, therefore bypassing the information act, all the while- destroying the evidence.
Hacking into the Climate Research Unit’s computer was the only way to protect this information, and this hacker deserves a metal. (Instead of jail time.)
If America and Britain had honest government leadership and a non-bias media, THEY would have been investigating these climate scientists all along.
The climate scientists who should be investigated are Phil Jones of the Climate Research Unit and Michael Mann of Penn State. (Plus, all of their staff.)
People like you, and myself, have fought FOR YEARS trying to tell people that humans are NOT making the earth warmer. We have fought to prove that the earth goes through natural cycles. (Ice ages, warming and cooling periods. Man has nothing to do with these cycles.) Sun spots also play a role in earth’s temperatures.
These hacked e-mails PROVE, without a doubt, that temperature readings and tree ring samples were “fudged” by climate scientists, to help show that man was causing the earth to warm.
Today, we can take a little break. For the golden rule of science is that: if there is any doubt, you MUST go back to the beginning and re-work the problem.
These new findings should make any respectable scientist say: “Aaahh- Oh, I have been duped by FAKE scientific models based on faulty data. Better drop this theory or my career will also be in the toilet.”
We were called: “flat-earthers” because we fought the man- made global warming theory.
There are “flat- earthers” involved in this story. However, it is not us.
Many people who fought the “round earth theory” had a financial reason for claiming that the earth was flat. These people had businesses along the established “land based” trade routes. “Flat- earthers” would lose tons of money if ships could sail across a “round” earth. So, they tried to crush the “round earth theory” to keep these land based trade route open.
Today, global warming scientists make a living from showing that man is causing the earth to warm up. That is their job and they will fight hard to prove that these hacked e-mails mean nothing.
Governments around the world, and large companies like GE have spent millions, even billions of dollars on GREEN technologies. These people are not going to just say “Ooops”, we made a mistake. They will still fight for the man- made global warming theory, just like the “flat-earthers did, years ago.
Media outlets like CNN, NBC, and CBS have spent tons of time pushing the global warming theory. They still think that they have credibility with viewers and they fear that if they admit that they were wrong about global warming, you might lose faith in their “objective” reporting.
However, these media outlets lost their objectivity many years ago.
The fight is not over…
There are thousands of people who make a living off of global warming, and other people have fortunes riding on this theory. Just like the flat-earthers of long ago, they will fight hard to keep their jobs and their fortunes. They MUST make you believe that YOU are making the earth warmer.
I was very lucky, I read a book many years ago, called: “The Skeptical Environmentalist” by Bjorn Lomborg. Lomborg LOVES the earth. He loves all the furry little creatures that inhabit this planet. He was a “back-packing” member of “Greenpeace” for 4 years. Lomborg preaches “personal” conservation. (As in- your personal choice on what you are conserving.)
When Bjorn Lomborg first started to study man- made global warming, he was turned off by one little fact: tree ring technology and earth core samples didn’t match up with each other. Climate scientists had to “fudge” numbers so that both- tree rings and core samples lined up together and PROVED that man was making the earth warmer.
Science doesn’t “fudge” numbers. If you corrupt the data, it is no longer science. You are now pushing a political agenda.
Which is what man-made global warming is: a political agenda.
LINK: The Skeptical Environmentalist
Hacking into computers is a crime. However, I am very thankful that this information got out there. Maybe now, we can have a rational, scientific debate about our place on this earth.
I am also thankful that Barack Obama did NOT win the 2008 election.
Had Barack Obama won the election, we might be in BIG trouble right now.
The guy that we have as president right now does a lot of speeches. He travels around the world a lot. He talks about stuff, but he doesn’t get this stuff done.
I can live with that. (Until 2012.) I just wish that this guy would make up his mind on Afghanistan.
But, that Barack Obama guy who was running for president…
That Obama guy was going to bankrupt the coal industry. Obama was going to pass a “cap and trade” bill that would raise our utility bills.
Remember, that Obama guy?
Barack Obama said that if you put more air in your car tires and if you wore a sweater in your house, you could make the earth cooler. You could save the polar bears by wearing a sweater in your house.
That guy..!!
If that Barack Obama guy won the election, we could be in real bad shape right now.
Man- made global warming believers, don’t feel bad. We have all been duped by something. I must admit to being a little nervous in 1999 during the Y2K scare; fearing that my money in the bank might “disappear” when the bank’s computers switched from 1999, to the year 2000.
We all get tricked, sometimes.
Now is the time to join together and STOP federal laws that will kill our already shaky economy.
If science wants to continue to study mans effects on this earth, that is fine. If you want to drive a smaller car and turn your heater off, that is great. It is your personal choice in a free country.
However, changing our way of life through federal laws and crippling our economy because of an educated guess, is insane.
On THIS Thanksgiving, I am thankful that people are beginning to see the truth about man- made global warming.
Maybe now we can put the man- made global warming theory away, where it belongs. Right along side of other scary myths, like:
Y2K- (will kill you)
Man- made Global Cooling (will kill you)
The world is flat (and you will die)
Fire- breathing dragons (will kill you)
Happy Thanksgiving..!!
Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic
Links for this story:
LINK: The Washington Post- talks about who’s computers were hacked and what was learned.
UK Telegraph- is the end near for the global warming theory
LINK: Climate Scientist asked to resign
Senator Inhofe will ask the Senate to investigated the Climate Change Hoax after the Thanksgiving break.
Here is a radio interview with Sen. Inhofe.
Barry G- Lone Conservative in a Liberal World
“Bad News” and “The Angry Republic” present:
The NEW adventures of Barry Goldwater
(A modern “re- telling” of a man born 50 years ahead of his time.)
We enter a world that is not much different then our own world, today.
People are people, after all.
The people of both worlds want the same thing: A place where you are free to make your dreams a reality. A place where you can meet someone to love. A decent place to raise a family. A place where you do not fear growing old.
In this respect, our worlds are not much different.
However, in the form of government rule, we would not recognize the world in which Barry Goldwater lived. It would be totally alien to us.
Democrats ruled the land for twenty years. And Democrats would have ruled for another twenty years more, if it had not been for a couple of men.
In this parallel world, it was a totally “alien” democratic party. A democratic party that locked away thousands of Americans in internment camps. Americans, who’s only crime was that they were “different.” (Japanese, German, Italian)
A democratic party that pushed the “proverbial” BUTTON, that unleashed nuclear weapons. The ONLY time that nuclear weapons have ever been used by anyone, to kill people.
In Barry G’s world, these were the days of the brutal democrat. They called themselves: “New Dealers.”
Some Americans began to quip: “New Deal my ass. It is the democrat’s way, or you go to jail. That’s the New Deal.”
But change was in the air.
The year was 1953.
There was no “Fox News Channel.”
No “Rush Limbaugh” broadcasting for three hours a day.
There wasn’t even a conservative magazine called: “National Review.”
In 1953, conservatives exchanged ideas mostly by word of mouth, on the streets.
It was your neighbor who shared your vision of America, with a smaller government and MORE personal freedom.
It was the occasional editorial in the Chicago Tribune that warned of the dangers of communism, which was spreading around the world.
Conservatism could be found in a quaint story about a “small town America” where you didn’t have to lock your doors, and people helped each other. These people didn’t need the government to pull money out of their pockets, by taxation, to help the poor. People helped people because they wanted to. You could find these stories in “Readers Digest” and “The Saturday Evening Post”.
There were conservatives out there. But it could hardly be called: “A movement.”
That is, until Barry Goldwater.
The date- January 3rd, 1953.
Barry Goldwater is about to be sworn in as an American Senator from Arizona.
We are about to peek into Goldwater’s personal journal, and learn from our republican past.
An alien world, far-far away.
Goldwater writes:
“...There were a few conservatives in congress during those days. Although Dwight D. Eisenhower had just become the first republican president in twenty years, the nation was still moving left.
Liberalism dominated not only the country’s political and educational lives...
Liberalism dominated the media.
It was extremely difficult for a conservative to be heard, much less understood.
From my early days, I never accepted the notion that conservatism was a primer for the past- that we didn’t have a vision of or faith in the future.
We (conservatives) saw the future of America in the hands of the MANY, not the self-anointed few.
For forty years, the nations liberals had conjured up false conservative, capitalistic stereotypes- of selfish people with inordinate wealth, intellectually rooted in a ‘dead yesterday.’
(On the contrary,) liberals offered to plan your life out for you.
Liberals would plan out your whole life under (the rule of HUGE) Democratic administrations, complete with “Great Societies” and “New Dealers.”
Behind all of the promise of the (liberal) planners lay a cynical contempt for the individual freedoms which make America different. (Individual freedoms which have driven millions of people, from everywhere on this earth, to make it to America, or DIE trying.)
My political mission is to restore those individual freedoms, despite the welfare state.
(While raising my hand and becoming a Senator), I took comfort in the oath to support and defend the Constitution of these United States. I was at home with the Constitution. I told myself that enterprising America, in the surge of new nations around the globe, was a good representation of rising expectations.
We ARE the world’s REAL revolutionaries.
Our principals, (contained in The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution) are lighting political fires never dreamed of by Lenin or world communism.
(My political goals...)
I have little interest in streamlining government, or in making it MORE efficient, for I mean to reduce government’s size.
I will not undertake the promotion of welfare, for I propose to extend freedom.
My aim is NOT to pass NEW laws, but to repeal them.
My goal is not to create NEW government programs, but to cancel old programs that do violence to the Constitution, or have failed in their purpose, or programs that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden.
I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is needed, BEFORE I determine if this legislation is constitutionally permissible.
And if in the future I am attacked by a constituent for not minding his interests, I will remind him that I was charged with protecting his liberty.
In that cause, I have done my very best.
Today, these are respectable political views. However, in 1953 when I started in the Senate, these ideas were revolutionary...”
Will Barry Goldwater find his voice within the HUGE liberal Senate..??
Can Goldwater start the conservative movement..??
The only way to know for sure is to tune in for another exciting episode of:
Barry G- Lone Conservative in a Liberal World
Our next exciting episode is titled:
“Barry G- The attack of the Slush Fund Liberals”
Can Barry G survive the “Slush Fund Liberals”? Or will this story be over before it begins?
DVD extras and editorial “special features”:
“The making of: Barry G- Lone Conservative in a Liberal World”
“Barry G: Fact-toids:” Facts about Barry Goldwater.
Some people have asked me if I was making fun of Barry Goldwater with this promo picture that we used to promote our editorials on Barry Goldwater.
Actually, this was an inside joke, and a funny story about Barry Goldwater.
When Goldwater was running for president, a person in charge of publicity thought it would be great to make a soda pop called: “Goldwater”, (because Barry’s name sounded like a drink, anyways.)
The first idea was that this soft drink should be a gold / yellow color and flavored like lemons.
“Lemons”..?? ( Not good for a politician) Plus- gold / yellow, the color of urine..??
So, that idea was scrapped and they made the “Goldwater” soda drink with orange coloring and flavor.
When Barry Goldwater first tasted the “Goldwater” soft drink, he said that it smelled like goat piss.
Goldwater never cared for the promotional soft drink and later cleaned up his explanation of why, for the public: “It tastes like gnat urine.”

Goldwater, who served in the military during WW2, was asked what he thought about Gay people serving in the military?
Goldwater replied:
“..I could care less if a man is straight, I only care if he can shoot straight...”
Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic (with actual quotes from Barry Goldwater.)
Thanks for reading
The Angry Republic
If I were a democrat, I would-
Ask: Will President Obama “pardon” the Thanksgiving turkey?
Or will Barack Obama send the Thanksgiving turkey to New York City for a civilian trial, which will turn into a “circus” side-show trial?
God help that poor turkey..!!
God, help us all..!!
It’s that time once again where we give advice to people who DO NOT WANT IT.
Democrats will not heed this advice.
They will shrug their shoulders and boast: “What the hell does he know? He is a stupid conservative who wants to kill baby ducks, and starve Black people, and kick old people out of nursing homes, and take health care away from sick children. WHAT COULD I POSSIBLY LEARN FROM THIS IDIOT..??”
Well, you could learn a few things because I am on the outside, looking in.
I am not seated inside the “Hope and Change” bus ride to hell.
So, I will offer this advice, EVEN IF no one ever reads it. Or heeds it.
(Here we go…)
If I were a democrat, I would:
Question WHY my democratically controlled congress FEELS the need to slip these health care bills in on a weekend, right before a holiday?
What’s up with that..??
Why be so freaking sneaky..??
Remember, this health care bill would (if passed) be with us FOREVER.
Isn’t the goal here to seriously reform the US health care system? Isn’t the REAL goal of this bill to make health insurance MORE affordable, to MORE people..??
Wouldn’t that be a GOOD THING..??
Then why all of the “smoke and mirrors”? Why must the “meat” of this bill be hidden within 2,000 pages of “stuff”?
Why must these bills be slipped in on a weekend, right before a holiday?
Forget republicans..!!
You do not need republicans to pass these bills, and republicans cannot stop these bills if democrats gang up against us.
Look at it this way…
If you helped write a congressional bill that will solve the health care “crisis” in America, wouldn’t you be proud of that achievement..??
If you wrote a bill that will really REALLY solve America’s health crisis, wouldn’t you want to explain to the American people why your bill will work. Wouldn’t you (and your fellow authors) form a committee and answer questions pertaining to this bill..?? Questions that we Americans have?
Why would you “hide” your health bill under the cover of 2,000 pages, and slip it into congress during a weekend, before a holiday?
Maybe, YOU, (the author of this bill) are not real sure about this bill? Maybe you are not proud of this bill? Maybe that is why you have to bribe fellow democratic senators with pork money to get them to sign it?
LINK: Harry Reid gives Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu 100 MILLION bucks to vote YES.
People, the senate is not voting to rename a post office, or some simple task like that.
The senate is voting on a bill that will effect each one of us. Once passed, this bill will be dam near impossible to fix, later on.
If I were a democrat, I would:
Ask; why hasn’t anyone in my party taken the responsibility to say: “This is my bill, I am proud of it, and I will answer any questions you have about this bill.”
(Because the dirty little secret is that YOU, the liberal, also have questions about this health care bill. You have concerns and you do not know who to ask?) Nor do I?
You, the liberal, are beginning to ask “why DO these bills have to be slipped into vote on the weekend right before the senate leaves for Thanksgiving?”
You, the liberal, are beginning to wonder why: “if this health care bill is so good, why did congress (The House of Representatives) have to sneak their bill in on Halloween, when many members of congress had plans to fly home and be with their kids on Halloween?
Because you are intelligent, you are asking yourself: “why hasn’t ANYONE; from President Obama, to Speaker Pelosi, to Sen. Reid, taken the time to fully explain what this bill will do? How much it will cost, and why there are no other options?”
If I were a democrat, I would:
Ask: Why the rush..?? The benefits of this bill do not take effect until 2013. Yet we have to pay for it NOW..?? Why can’t we, the democrats, have an honest debate about this bill?
If I were a democrat, I would:
Contact my Senator and STOP this bill.
You are not an evil republican who wants to STOP health care. You are a concerned American who has questions. We all have questions.
You would never buy a car without driving it. You would never sign a house mortgage without reading the agreement. (That’s how a lot of people got themselves in trouble with home loans.)
Yet, that is exactly what congress is asking you to do. Sit back, shut up, and do not ask any questions.
Is this the kind of America that we are “changing” to? Where we can’t even ask congress: “Hey, what is this $500 BILLION dollar cut to Medicare all about? How will it effect my Grandparents?”
LINK: Democrats cut $500 billion from old people to pay for your health insurance. (LA Times)
Is THIS the kind of America that we have evolved into? Where we cannot ask questions? We just cross our fingers and HOPE that congress will do the right thing?
If I were a democrat, I would:
Contact my senator and tell them to vote NO.
You can stop this bill.
I would tell my senator to go take his (or her) stupid vacation. I would tell my senator to pick this debate up in January when we can cut the pork from this bill. We can go over this bill- line by line, so that all of us Americans will have our questions answered. (Something that President Obama promised to do, but hasn’t gotten around to it.)
It’s not too late…
You can still contact your senator.
LINK: How to contact my senator.
(Though, most of the phone lines are jammed, and you will never know if your e-mail is landing into some giant cyber trash can, at least you will know that you tried to be a responsible American.)
If I were a democrat, I would:
Wonder, why is everyone in my party focused on Sarah Palin..??
If Palin is as dumb, inexperienced, and inept as liberals say she is, why are liberals so focused on her..??
Don’t we run the risk of making Sarah a sympathetic figure?
America has never had a woman president, and since no liberal woman will oppose President Obama in 2012, aren’t we actually giving Palin publicity?
Tons of FREE publicity..!!
(OK, maybe I should scratch that last one.)
Liberals…
You keep right on talking smack about Sarah Palin.
At least keep talking about Sarah Palin until 2011. Then, Americans will be so sick of hearing your negativity, that it will mean nothing, to no one.
Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic
Coming soon
(Maybe this weekend)
To The Angry Republic

Are you a republican..??
Are you lost and confused..??
Are you thirsty..??
Why not try some GOLD water..!!
It’s refreshing, and it no longer smells like goat piss.

“..When you have lost your way, it helps to review where you have been..”
A special editorial, coming soon to this site..!!
The NEW adventures of Barry Goldwater
“Barry G- Lone conservative in a Liberal World”
Thanks for reading
The Angry Republic

Trial of the Century- in NY City
I know that many of you are worried and concerned about President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder’s decision to bring “alleged” Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to New York City to face charges in a CIVILIAN federal court.
I feel your pain..!!
After all, Khalid was rounded up during a BATTLE raid, which took place DURING A WAR.
Therefore, Khalid was apprehended by military soldiers, DURING A WAR, and probably not read his Miranda Rights, or given his “one phone call”, or given a nice cozy sweater with a picture of a Thanksgiving turkey on it.
You, (thinking all “logical”) would assume that Khilad Sheikh Mohammed would be tried in a military style court. Considering the fact that Khilad, and his dear leader: Osama bin Laden, declared WAR against America in the 1990’s. The two plotted this WAR on The United States, and then carried out the attacks on American interests.
American interests; which included the death of nearly 3,000 Americans at the World Trade Towers.
Had Khilad Sheikh Mohammed NOT declared war on The United States, and was arrested by NY City police officers for robbing Macy’s; then we would be talking about a civilian court.
BUT YOU, (thinking all “logical”) believes that Khilad committed crimes against America, not just New York City.
Because Khilad Sheikh Mohammed declared WAR on The United States, carried out a massive attack, and was apprehended in War Time; you believe that Khilad should be tried in military fashion. A court that is designed to handle conditions of the battle field.
Silly you…
Thinking all “logical”.
If we did what you are asking; we would miss out on…
Hurry, hurry, hurry…
Step right up.
Come one, come all.
See the spectacle that is: Bush vs Khilad.
Watch in amazement, as a trial on a 9/11 KILLER: Khilad Sheikh Mohammed, turns into a trial on an American President, and military activities during a WAR.
Watch, as the City of New York is held hostage, by a massive trial that brings on NEW threats of violence. Thrill, as the people of NY City are subjected to NEW rounds of bag, purse, and body searches.
Watch as New York City is terrorized all over again.
Laugh out loud, because you can watch this spectacle from the comfort of you home; not having to live, or get to work in NY City.
Maybe you thought that OJ Simpson was guilty of murder?
Silly fool.
YOU WERE WRONG..!!
Maybe you thought that Michael Jackson was guilty of child molestation?
YOU WERE WRONG, AGAIN..!!
Is Khilad Sheikh Mohammed guilty of killing 3,000 Americans..??
Will you be wrong, again..??
Who Knows..??
The only way to know for sure, is to tune into the circus, which is:
President Obama…
If you have evidence to bring on court trials of the Bush Administration for torture, war crimes, or any other aspects that the FAR Left can conjure up; by all means, you have the right to do just that.
However this chicken shit, back door method that you are using now, is pathetic.
Mr. President…
Will you grow a pair and BE A MAN..!!
If you want to go after the Bush Administration, then go after them.
This “back door method” is not fooling anyone. Even the FAR Left.
You are “playing games” with a terrorist who killed more people then the Japanese did during Pearl Harbor.
President Obama, you are playing games with the City of New York; which is already over crowded, and already under fear of terror attacks.
President Obama…
Khilad Sheikh Mohammed MUST be tried in a military court.
Quit “playing games.”
Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic















































































